A documentary explains "The Capture Hypothesis"

We have avoided disaster and we are recovering... But the men and institutions that caused the crisis are still in power... and that needs to change. They (mammoth banks) will tell us that we need them, and that what they do is too complicated for us to understand. They will tell us it wont happen again... It wont be easy, but some things are worth fighting for.

Finally, I got some time to watch last year's academy award winning documentary, "Inside Job". And what a masterpiece it was! Perhaps, it is the finest documentary I have seen in my life. Neat and straight. It is based on the catastrophic financial crisis from which we are still trying to recover. Last year, I read a book by Suzanne McGee, "Chasing Goldman Sachs: How the masters of the universe melted Wall Street down... and why they will take us to the brink again." The reasons why I like this book and this documentary are the timing, my education and my area of interest. I was about to graduate from business school in  the midst of this crisis. And I was exposed directly or indirectly to majority of the events listed in the book and shown in the documentary.

"Inside Job" emphasizes on the critical issues like political influence, lobbying power of Wall St, corruption- collectively "Wall Street Government" and other market changing events like introduction of derivatives in early 90's, housing bubble, ponzi schemes, subprime lending and the rise of structured products like MBS, CDO and credit derivatives like CDS. But the most important thing I have understood through this documentary is an industry regulation theory, "Capture Hypothesis". According to this theory, regulators of different industries are elected/selected from the pool of experienced and influencing candidates from their respective industries only. For example, regulator for environmental issues cannot be selected from the finance & banking industry. And that is the reason why regulators are more biased towards industry rather than consumers. If they do not support the industry, their spot will become endangered. That is what happened with the failure of 3 big Iceland banks. That is what happened with the regulators' decisions(influenced by Henry Paulson and other top executives from number of big banks) of permitting banks' leverage ratio to rise as much as 20:1 and loosening the regulations on derivatives. Eventually, this led to the collapse of Lehman Brothers, AIG, Bear Sterns, Merrill Lynch, Washington Mutual, Wachovia and many others.

When I was in grad school, I had to watch Wall Street, Boiler Room and Rogue Trader. I am sure that B-school finance majors will have to watch documentaries like "Inside Job" down the roads since ethics and finance and banking and investment are all coherent with one another.

"New Normal"... Hope or Frustration?

Like every morning, I settled at my desk, logged in to my computer (Bloomberg Terminal) and read news. And saw a news story elaborating few economists' warning on unemployment rate in the US. Since the downturn started, we have been listening to and looking at all fiscal efforts to combat higher unemployment rate which is the key impediment to achieve economic growth. We have managed to drop it down to 9% and started to believe that within 3-4 years, it may be at its normal level. What is this "Normal Level"? Is it decided by the congress or economists or something else? Unexpected and turtle speed recovery in developed economies has certainly shifted those economic graphs.

Current unemployment rate is seen as "New Normal" by few economists. If that turns out to be true, then 8-9% rate will stay in normal business cycle. It may climb to 13% or 15% or 18%, if another downturn arrives. But no more hopes for those 5% or 7%?

Similar things follow in the case of US Debt Ceiling and US Credit Ratings. If we consider "New Normal" in debt ceiling, then new ceiling will allow the Government to borrow more than they are doing now. More public debt. Higher debt to GDP ratio. We know the consequences. I still remember one of the story on US credit ratings published couple of years ago. It said "If US credit rating is downgraded to AA from AAA, then new AAA will be AA." Doesn't it sound like "New Normal"? Yes, it does. New Normal changes the benchmarks.


Establishing "New Normal" for unemployment rate, debt ceiling and credit rating (... and many more may come) have positive consequences as well. Based on hopes and optimism, they give us room to accelerate recovery and to acquire potential growth opportunities. But that is what we have been doing since last three years. We might have started to realize that perhaps there is no hope. Potential frustration may make us prompt to start everything from scratch... and that can be done by creating new zeros... new benchmarks... new normal.

Inflation, Commodity Futures, Speculating, Hedging... And Coffee.

Few days ago, I read the news uttering about the Americans' reactions on the inflation- especially on higher food prices. And I immediately tweeted that the Americans should not outcry for higher prices when they have no idea about the painful inflation in the emerging markets. I spent 22 years in India and I can understand how cheaper the daily necessities in the US are.

Commodity futures are positively correlated with the inflation and that is the reason why investors choose them as an inflation-hedge in the long-run. Commodity prices are speculator's & hedger's game besides the global demand-supply. If perceived price risk in the future is higher for consumers of commodities, they buy the futures and the net long position sends market towards the contango. And if perceived price risk in the future is higher for producers of commodities, they sell the futures and the net short position pushes market towards the backwardation. Generally, perceived price risk in the future is higher for producers and because of this, commodity markets are in normal backwardation most of the time. But consistent upward pressure in the global inflation in the recent years has pushed the global commodity market in normal contango.

If we talk about the whopping prices of coffee, Starbucks is being considered as one of the culprits who pushed coffee futures in the contagion world. Based on their recent quarterly reports, they have shown noticeable hedging activities especially in coffee futures. Their speculation of higher coffee prices in the future made them take net long positions in the coffee futures. Per recent Financial Times news story, they are fully hedged against their needs until the end of this calendar year in April. And that tells the whole story about the speculation. I do not find any fundamentals.


It is a simple phenomenon. If bigger players like Starbucks keep on buying futures, then demand for futures increases regardless of other fundamental or economic factors. And contango stands out as a bull market with a possible commodity bubble. It is not illegal for corporations to perform hedging activities, but there should be some difference between speculating and hedging. Per my knowledge, whatever Starbucks is doing is speculation and whatever all airlines are doing is hedging.

Stepping Stone for Social Media IPOs...

One of the interviewers asked "If you have money to invest in, which stocks you buy?" And I responded "I would have said Netflix if you had asked me the same question few months ago, but now I like LinkedIn. I am waiting for their IPO." Yes, LinkedIn it is. Investors are waiting for Thursday, May 19, 2011 when LinkedIn is likely to hit NYSE.

When you have faith in a company's operations, culture, financials, policies and strategies; you will see your money being secured while investing in it. It is all about confidence factor, but not about following the herd. One of my friends said that this stock is going to make you wealthy and all variations thereof, never work in long-run. Such sort of investor confidence is provided to LinkedIn. And that is the reason why they have raised the size of their IPO twice after their announcement in January 2011. Per recent announcement of their IPO size, stock will likely to trade between $42-$45 and valuation will be around whopping $4 billions.

Why not? If company believes in their chores and realizes the lustrous confidence of investors, it should ride on it. Personally, I have faith in LinkedIn and that is why I gave that response to an interviewer. LinkedIn is a part of  bullish social media industry, but it may be the only company who is providing the professional networking. Their business model seems clearly different than what Facebook, Twitter and others have. They connect recruiters, companies and job seekers in the unique ways.

Stepping stone. LinkedIn being the first social media company in the US who is going public this week, provides some efficacious groundwork for potential future IPOs of Facebook & Groupon. LinkedIn's valuation is certainly way lower than what Facebook and Groupon are valued at. But their post-IPO stage may deliver few twists in this household industry.

... "what is LinkedIn and why is it so hyped?" I hear such questions from professionals of the industries where vacant jobs are more than number of job seekers. The only key limitation I consider in the business model.

Where's the dinner tonight?

Well, being a connoisseur of food, I love to visit world cuisines and new restaurants in the proximity. And that includes few restaurant chains as well. I am a global individual, ain't I? Restaurant/dining sector was punished hard during the recession of 2007. Few chains were not able to produce profits for consecutive 2 years. And few bounced back like a marathon spring. But as they are saying, gone are the days! Restaurant Performance Index (RPI) is up again and back at 2005-2007 levels. Consumers have started to hate cooking food at home and so the sector components have started to cook some profits after years.

Here are some of the characteristics of this rebounding and bullying sector:

• Industry leaders: Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc (CMG), Panera Bread Company (PNRA), BJ's Restaurant Inc (BJRI) and Domino's Pizza, Inc (DPZ) are leading the sector with handsome growth and stock appreciation. 
• Other growth proponents: Few restaurants chains have not been able to beat the market, but they have succeeded to help sector to boost its performance. They are Yum! Brand, Inc (YUM), Darden Restaurants, Inc (DRI), Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc (RRGB), The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE), California Pizza Kitchen, Inc (CPKI), Papa John's International, Inc (PZZA) and many others.
• Turnarounds: A rise in consumer confidence, fall in unemployment rate, introduction of breakfast menus like Subway did, diversification in the traditional core menu like Domino's did by introducing all those gourmet pastas and subs and expansion of operations in emerging markets where consumers have newly found wealth to spend. 
• Optimism: Rise in IPOs is a good indication of industry optimism. Recently, Arcos Dorados Holdings, Inc (ARCO), Bravo Brio Restaurant Group, Inc (BBRG) and Country Style Cooking Restaurant Chain Co. Ltd (CCSC) went public. Leading coffee giant Dunkin Donuts Inc has just filed for an IPO under the ticker of DNKN.
• Pessimism: This sector is not an exception and that is the reason why it has also been affected by rising oil prices and skyrocketing inflation. These macroeconomic factors have caused restaurant chains to increase the noticeable prices in their menus.

... Mind well! Subway Restaurants have the honor of being considered as the world's largest restaurant chain after their locations figure surpassed McDonald's Corp (MCD) in the beginning of this year. And and and... The world's largest restaurant chain is still not publicly traded.

Tumbling WMT is healthy sign for the economy, isn't it?

We were given fictitious $250,000 to invest in 5 securities by our professor during one of the electives of the grad school. Investment Analysis it was. The objective of our portfolio was to preserve our capital. Those few lucky securities chosen by us were WMT, FDO and healthy weight on treasury bills. Based on our security selection and objective, I wonder any one cannot assume what period it was. Right? Yes, it was the midst of catastrophic recession which started in the 2007.

The best performance of WMT and the worst performance of NASDAQ Composite Index relative to each other during last 5 years, took place during the recessionary period. And that is the reason why we love to consider WMT as a recession-proof stock. But if we observe the charts now, NASDAQ composite and other market indices are quickly approaching to the higher returns. These are the signs of early expansion which are not preferred by discount stores like Wal-Mart who have been reporting consecutive decline in sales. Their stock is pretty much down from where it was during the great recession. If that is not enough, recent hike in gas prices and inflation have worsened  the outlook for the discount stores.

Wal-Mart has been trying various strategies to regain their momentum despite of negative correlation with the markets:

• Recently, they have announced to acquire Kosmix which discovers social content by topic. This acquisition may bring Wal-Mart to the new age of social media influence on electronic and mobile commerce. When a retail mammoth taps the Silicon Valley, it has to be something strategic. And these are the impediments behind the expansion of WalmartLabs. 
• Few days ago, they tested their online grocery store. This may have been game changing event if consumers easily adapt to this service. It can definitely give Wal-Mart some edge over its peers.
• After successful entry in the Chicago market in the 2006, Wal-Mart began to think over the New York City market which has high barriers for entry. And based on poll results in the early 2011, New Yorkers showed positive response to embrace Wal-Mart.

... and if these help them perform well and beat the market, do we have to remove WMT from the list of those recession-proof stocks?

Head to China and Enhance the Ubiquity

Rumors. Rumors. And more rumors. Once you are on the top of the tree, you will likely to hear all sort of rumors surrounding you. Social media is the new, intangible household material and the most bullish industry sector. Rumors follow it. Facebook rules that industry. More rumors follow it. News feed is considering Facebook deal with Baidu to reenter China as blockbuster rumor. Facebook may have dealt with some local social network to enter China again after it was banned in the July 2008. No news has been confirmed by either Facebook or Baidu. But I can see handsome & strategic implications behind this.

As of June 30, 2010

Facebook undoubtedly reigns the social networking. It has becoming more ubiquitous with every sunrise. But because of China's ban on Facebook, it is still unexposed to the biggest Internet usage market in the world. If Facebook collaborate with some local social network there as stated in the news, it may have been turnaround for them. Facebook may be household name in the market of nearly 1.5 billion people. And this Chinese Presence may help Facebook to flourish revenues and amplify its already whopping valuation. If such thing happens before Facebook's possible IPO, I   can imagine some record setting numbers for IPOs.


After these rumors, we should not be surprised to see manifold bankers to visit Mark Zuckerberg and other considerable heads of Facebook every now and then. The Chase is going to be earnest and pungent...