Illegal Insider Trading

Wire tapes... SEC... FBI...Whistle blowing?... Arrest... Plead guilty?... And what not?... Bottom line is Illegal Insider Trading- A tagline which we have been hearing about for past 2-3 years. Why does it happen on the first place? And if that happens, why does it come to public after years? I guess it is a part of a vicious cycle. And this does not mean I favor some/rare insider trading. It must not happen at all to preserve the integrity of financial markets which drive the globe in all ways.

When economy is booming, everyone tries make more money to save their jobs and their company position. No one bothers to investigate why he or she or they are making insane amount of money. But when everything cools down and if that cooling down turns in to a recession or freezing of liquidity, authorities wonder why these have happened. And they start investigation, they find culprits. All get warned. Temporary freeze in insider trading. And again, when economy picks up, competition to make money and to chase big traders/ banks begins ("Chasing Goldman Sachs" book depicts how traders/ hedge funds want to make money so badly that they forget ethics... Why? Just to combat the competition. If trading platform of ABC bank makes this much, why can't we do that?).

This must stop or extra efforts must be provided to prevent it. Whole world runs on financial markets. If it does not save its integrity, everything becomes vulnerable to shatter.

Business Cycle Transparency

Developed economies are more transparent than emerging economies are. We all have heard about this, haven't we? If that is the fact, then I need to make myself work harder to believe it.

After the great recession hit the world in the year 2008, I could never understand clearly in what phase of the business cycle the US was and has been. Is it early upswing or late upswing or is it slowdown? Only thing I am sure about is that it is certainly neither initial recovery nor recession (please correct me if I am wrong). Recent healthy economic growth and relatively low inflation in the US suggests that we are in early upswing. There are no restrictive policies in the place as of now and that does not put us in the late upswing phase. But nervous investors have begun to think that equities are volatile and stock market is near its all-time peak in the 2007. Isn't that favoring late upswing? It is dilemma to me since I am not an economist! Capital market expectations are always critical to judge after prolonged recessions and a depression. If we observe emerging economies, they are believed to bounce back from shocks faster than developed nations do. This was true even after the great recession. For example, India is clearly in late upswing phase where it is feeling tremendous inflationary pressure. Equity markets in India have shown considerable volatility. Monetary policies have become restrictive and short rates are rising to curb boom mentality. India is showing business cycle transparency which I want to observe here in the US. But I may be asking too much from $14 trillion economy. Perhaps that transparency has partly been offset by the great recession.

As I heard and expected, Apple has delivered finally...

$40, $50, $60, $70, $80, $90, $100 billion and counting. This is how the world's most valuable company has increased its cash over the last 3 years. Whenever companies sit on huge cash piles, there are always 2 possibilities. First, companies become conservative, especially post-recession years, in capital investments and hiring, and reports plethora of cash to combat another economic stress. Second, companies face controversial times from the investors. We strongly believe that Apple falls in to second choice.

When do companies pay dividends and when do they repurchase shares? Simple answers and simple signals. When a company believes that there are no more opportunities to invest money, acquire assets or there is a shrinking room for current above average growth, they pay dividends to reward investors. And when a company believes that their equity is undervalued, they repurchase some shares in the market. I have not performed any equity fundamentals on $AAPL and this is why I cannot say if its equity market value is undervalued or overvalued. But I can somehow convince myself that there is some decrease in growth is forecast by the management after a dream post-recession run and paying dividends is the best way to keep investors tagged along.

As I heard and expected over the last few months, Apple has finally announced to pay dividends and $10 billion worth of share repurchase today. Though its dividend yield is less than its peers, it is going to be interesting new chapter for Apple, being considered mature in the market.

Cash is "The King"

What is the difference between the great recession started in 2007-2008 and the global crisis we are currently facing? It is a 4 letter simple word. CASH- no matter what currency it is.

If I focus on the US, the biggest economy in the world, all big banks and corporations are sitting on the huge piles of cash. This was not the case 4 years ago. Most of them were cash stricken. After Apple Inc, the most valued company on this planet, released its 2011 Q2 results, it showed over $70 billions of cash & cash equivalents which is more than the GDP of many countries. Lessons learned perfectly- that's what we can say! Now the question is if these mammoth companies have enormous amount of cash, then why are we on the verge of another worldwide crisis? It is because everyone is too skeptical about economy, political unrest and discomfort in European economies. No one wants to spend their cash based on weak outlooks. If there is no cash circulating in the markets, then how can one make money and drive economy along?

In the course of company's life cycle, if management thinks there is no more growth ahead, then they distribute  excess cash as dividends to reward investors or buy back their own shares. Recently, share buy back has been a spree which is a good sign since companies buy back their "cheap" shares in anticipation of increase in share value. But many companies are issuing cheaper bonds to raise cash and use that cash to buy back their shares. Isn't it unusual? Why would they not use abundant cash they have and end up paying interest payments to bond holders? We have connected the dots here. No one wants to use "cash" they have. Everyone has figured out that cash is the only way to get their company out of the potential financial mess. And once again, it has been proved that cash is the only king you want to save till the end.

Netflix confuses subscribers with a canny idea...

Price hikes. They are riding on the ECON 101 rule of growth and competitiveness in an industry. From my perspective, I was ok with paying half dozen bucks more a month after I heard the news couple of months ago. I think the money I pay for the service and access to the huge library I get is worth. But I am not on the same page with many of the 23 million domestic subscribers. We all do not need to be...

Reed Hastings, CEO of Netflix, sent an apology email to all domestic subscribers for the current pricing disappointment the company has given to their subscribers. The email also contains a brief on the company's plan to separate their streaming (Netflix) and DVD rental unit (will be named as Qwikster). Why? Why would they do such thing when everyone is still coping with the mess company has recently created? And I can imagine a canny idea behind this.

Internet access is ubiquitous. YouTube, Amazon Instant Streaming, Dish Network's acquisition of Blockbuster library and many more to come to share a pie of video streaming business. Growth is going to be good for next few years. Decline phase is not in sight. While the reverse is the destiny for DVD business which has sluggish growth forecasts and is going to be nearly unseen in next 10-15 years. In simple language, if weak outlook for DVD business persists, then Netflix (streaming only) is a better place to get handsome ROI than Netflix (Current: streaming + DVD).

"Wall Street to Netflix: Try Again". I read that on Twitter. After Hastings's public apology, share price tumbled further. So, a tweet justifies a stock market reaction to this event. But now I do not think alike. This seems like a smart move to me rather than pleasing the investors on day-to-day basis. Growth is not immortal. The more you extend your maturity phase, the longer you survive. And Netflix may have learned that already.

What Is Risk-Free Rate?

Let's begin with RISK-FREE RATE 101 class. (Prerequisites: Default-free, Treasury, Safe, Secured)

2 years in the business school and reading all those books of CFA program curriculum. The most repeated term has been- Risk-Free Rate (Rf). It is considered as yield of US Treasury securities. US Government is (was?) considered as default-free thought it fought hard to prevent default recently. Whenever global economy melts or shakes, investors look for Treasury securities. They have been known as the safest investment since there is no volatility or risk included. We employ many risk-return tools (for example, Sharpe Ratio) to calculate excess return achieved by investing in particular assets. This excess return is calculated by considering risk-free rate as benchmark. Many countries with political instability and higher inflation rates do not have their risk-free rates. They add their inflation rate to US risk-free rate to get the benchmark rate for their country. And thus long-term bond yields and so on. This is what the biggest economy stands for.

But in the recent turmoil, I am not able to believe completely that we should still use Treasury yields as risk-free rate or not? I do not want to discuss why S&P has recently downgraded US credit ratings to AA+ from AAA. It may be reversed or may be not. S&P might be wrong in deriving this verdict or they might be late in doing this. I do not know the facts. But few things I surely know that there are few problems in Washington DC. There are serious fiscal challenges we have been facing. Looking at the current scenarios, US may not deserve AAA. But when country has to put efforts to prevent default which US did last week, their risk-free rate should not be considered as default-free rate or benchmark rate. Why can't we change that? Why can't we use risk-free rates from countries like UK, Germany and Canada who still have AAA?

I am not sure about literature we used in the business school, but CFA institute updates its books every year based on recent market conditions. I will not be surprised if I see Canadian rates as risk-free rate in those books next year...

Chipotle: Expectations vs Fundamentals...

I never thought that "burritos" would bring me out from hibernation (it has been nearly more than 3 weeks since I wrote the last blog). I love their food. Many of us do. It is Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc (ticker: CMG). Short, simple and affordable- 3 words help it rule its peers. An inspirational success and growth story. Following chart  says it all:

Phenomenal growth. Handsome return to investors. Stock was worth $38 on November 20, 2008. Stock is worth $330 today. Do I need to show return figures? Company's business model is fundamentally strong. They target fast food consumers who want to spend $5-$10 on their meals. It has nicely managed the global food inflation. Its store operate in all metropolitan area of the US and try to provide affordable options in such areas. Conclusion: Sweet & Sound!

Yesterday, they announced their second quarter earnings. Earnings were pretty good despite of rough outlook of the global economy. All numbers were decent and higher than last quarter. But I heard the voice.... "Clear Disappointment". I am still trying to figure out why I was supposed to hear that. Reason was--- they missed analysts' estimates. What bothers me is they missed it by dozen cents. Negative earnings surprise. I understand that analysts on the street perform all fundamental analysis and provide their estimates. But I still consider a phrase "Failing to meet expectations" which may make another phrase "Clear Disappointment". If we compare all the numbers with its peers and industry overall, they are still the leader. There is nothing wrong happening with its revenue generating model. It is partially because of too much expectations, isn't it?

Based on Chipotle's news, I wonder what happens in the market if mammoth Apple Inc misses its estimates. Worse. Worst. Why? They never respect analysts' estimates and always believe it positive earnings surprise!! Yesterday, they announced those bottom line numbers 25% greater than estimates. And that sends the story to investors for their EXPECTATIONS from Apple in the next quarter...

"New Normal"... Hope or Frustration?

Like every morning, I settled at my desk, logged in to my computer (Bloomberg Terminal) and read news. And saw a news story elaborating few economists' warning on unemployment rate in the US. Since the downturn started, we have been listening to and looking at all fiscal efforts to combat higher unemployment rate which is the key impediment to achieve economic growth. We have managed to drop it down to 9% and started to believe that within 3-4 years, it may be at its normal level. What is this "Normal Level"? Is it decided by the congress or economists or something else? Unexpected and turtle speed recovery in developed economies has certainly shifted those economic graphs.

Current unemployment rate is seen as "New Normal" by few economists. If that turns out to be true, then 8-9% rate will stay in normal business cycle. It may climb to 13% or 15% or 18%, if another downturn arrives. But no more hopes for those 5% or 7%?

Similar things follow in the case of US Debt Ceiling and US Credit Ratings. If we consider "New Normal" in debt ceiling, then new ceiling will allow the Government to borrow more than they are doing now. More public debt. Higher debt to GDP ratio. We know the consequences. I still remember one of the story on US credit ratings published couple of years ago. It said "If US credit rating is downgraded to AA from AAA, then new AAA will be AA." Doesn't it sound like "New Normal"? Yes, it does. New Normal changes the benchmarks.


Establishing "New Normal" for unemployment rate, debt ceiling and credit rating (... and many more may come) have positive consequences as well. Based on hopes and optimism, they give us room to accelerate recovery and to acquire potential growth opportunities. But that is what we have been doing since last three years. We might have started to realize that perhaps there is no hope. Potential frustration may make us prompt to start everything from scratch... and that can be done by creating new zeros... new benchmarks... new normal.

Tumbling WMT is healthy sign for the economy, isn't it?

We were given fictitious $250,000 to invest in 5 securities by our professor during one of the electives of the grad school. Investment Analysis it was. The objective of our portfolio was to preserve our capital. Those few lucky securities chosen by us were WMT, FDO and healthy weight on treasury bills. Based on our security selection and objective, I wonder any one cannot assume what period it was. Right? Yes, it was the midst of catastrophic recession which started in the 2007.

The best performance of WMT and the worst performance of NASDAQ Composite Index relative to each other during last 5 years, took place during the recessionary period. And that is the reason why we love to consider WMT as a recession-proof stock. But if we observe the charts now, NASDAQ composite and other market indices are quickly approaching to the higher returns. These are the signs of early expansion which are not preferred by discount stores like Wal-Mart who have been reporting consecutive decline in sales. Their stock is pretty much down from where it was during the great recession. If that is not enough, recent hike in gas prices and inflation have worsened  the outlook for the discount stores.

Wal-Mart has been trying various strategies to regain their momentum despite of negative correlation with the markets:

• Recently, they have announced to acquire Kosmix which discovers social content by topic. This acquisition may bring Wal-Mart to the new age of social media influence on electronic and mobile commerce. When a retail mammoth taps the Silicon Valley, it has to be something strategic. And these are the impediments behind the expansion of WalmartLabs. 
• Few days ago, they tested their online grocery store. This may have been game changing event if consumers easily adapt to this service. It can definitely give Wal-Mart some edge over its peers.
• After successful entry in the Chicago market in the 2006, Wal-Mart began to think over the New York City market which has high barriers for entry. And based on poll results in the early 2011, New Yorkers showed positive response to embrace Wal-Mart.

... and if these help them perform well and beat the market, do we have to remove WMT from the list of those recession-proof stocks?